Cellphone radiation poses no real harm to humans, new research says
Unless you’re a male rat bathing in cellphone radiation, experts say you should be fine.
Male rats showed a small increase in a kind of heart
tumor after exposure to massive amounts of cellphone radiation, a new
government study reports. But don’t read too much into that, experts say
— because those rats bathed in more radiation than even the heaviest
cellphone users would experience.
There are ongoing worries about whether cellphones can give you cancer — especially brain cancer, since our phones spend so much time near our faces. It’s true that cell phones do emit radiation. But it’s radiofrequency radiation, which is much lower energy than the ionizing radiation you’d get from an X-ray, or, say, nuclear fallout. Ionizing radiation can cause DNA damage that can eventually lead to cancer. But the radiofrequency radiation from a cellphone doesn’t work that way — and today’s results support that.
One of the studies reports that male rats exposed to very
high levels of radiofrequency radiation grew tumors around their
hearts. Female rats exposed to the radiation didn’t, and neither male
nor female mice showed obvious health problems in a second
study. Neither study turned up clear evidence that radiofrequency
radiation causes brain tumors, although the researchers are continuing
to investigate. The studies are drafts that haven’t yet been reviewed by
outside scientists.
While the Federal Communication Commission limits how
much radiofrequency radiation can come out of your cellphone, the Food
and Drug Administration can have a say about whether those limits are
safe. So the FDA asked the National Toxicology Program (NTP), a division
within the National Institutes of Health, to investigate. Based on the
NTP’s results, as well as hundreds of other studies, the FDA is still confident that the current limits on cellphone radiation are safe, according to a statement from Jeffrey Shuren, the director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
The study specifically used 2G and 3G frequencies — not
the frequencies used on more advanced 4G or 5G networks. Researchers
exposed the rodents’ entire bodies to the radiowaves for more than nine
hours per day, for up to two years. (“A rat that is 2 years old is
roughly equivalent to a 70-year-old person,” STAT News reports.) These exposure levels were much higher than what people would experience, John Bucher, senior scientist with the NTP, says in a statement. “So, these findings should not be directly extrapolated to human cell phone usage,” he says.
And even with these unusually high levels of exposure, the links to cancer were still “mostly equivocal, or ambiguous,” according to the FDA’s statement.
In fact, the rats exposed to cell phone radiation actually appeared to
live longer than the ones that weren’t, a finding that the FDA’s Shuren says the agency is assessing. The difference could simply be the result of chance, STAT News reports.
So, what do these results in rodents mean for people? Not
a whole lot, experts say. “Even with frequent daily use by the vast
majority of adults, we have not seen an increase in events like brain
tumors,” the FDA’s statement says. Otis Brawley, the American Cancer Society’s chief medical officer, agreed in an interview with The Associated Press. “The
evidence for an association between cellphones and cancer is weak, and
so far, we have not seen a higher cancer risk in people,” Brawley told
the AP in a phone interview. “I am actually holding my cellphone up to my ear.”
So,the myth of radiation of harming us Proved now.
No,need to worry more.
Comments
Post a Comment